Controversies in Nephrology Protocol Transplant Biopsies: Are They Really Needed?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Studies suggest that surveillance or protocol biopsies that are performed during the first year after kidney transplantation may be clinically useful in identifying early acute rejection or chronic allograft nephropathy at a point when they may be amenable to treatment. Although the benefit of this approach has yet to be evaluated in large, multicenter, prospective trials, numerous studies suggest that implementation of protocol biopsies may improve long-term graft function. In particular, a number of reports suggest that detection of chronic allograft nephropathy in early protocol biopsies is predictive of subsequent graft function and loss and that early treatment may have a dramatic effect on the outcome of the graft. Protocol biopsies also have the potential to be of great value in high-risk patients, such as those with delayed graft function, by allowing for early intervention for acute rejection. Furthermore, the procedure seems to be relatively straightforward and safe. Nevertheless, paucity of data has meant that clear proof of a benefit of early treatment of subclinical rejection and chronic allograft nephropathy detected by protocol biopsy is lacking. Moreover, the optimal timing of protocol biopsies and reliable methods to quantify the histologic changes observed in biopsy specimens have yet to be determined. This review discusses the pros and cons of protocol biopsies and considers the place of this procedure in the routine treatment of kidney transplant patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1: 130 –137, 2006. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00350705
منابع مشابه
Controversies in Nephrology Protocol Biopsies: Pros and Cons for Their Use in Routine Treatment of Kidney Transplant Patients
Studies suggest that surveillance or protocol biopsies that are performed during the first year after kidney transplantation may be clinically useful in identifying early acute rejection or chronic allograft nephropathy at a point when they may be amenable to treatment. Although the benefit of this approach has yet to be evaluated in large, multicenter, prospective trials, numerous studies sugg...
متن کاملLow-density array PCR analysis of reperfusion biopsies: an adjunct to histological analysis.
BACKGROUND Histologic evaluation of baseline kidney biopsies is an inconsistent tool to predict graft outcomes, which might be assisted by gene expression analysis. METHODS We evaluated 49 consecutive kidney graft biopsies obtained post-reperfusion in 18 deceased donors (DD) and 31 living donors (LD) at our center. Biopsies were evaluated and scored using Banff criteria. Low-density real-time...
متن کاملProtocol biopsy: what is the rationale and what is the evidence?
The incidence of acute rejection (and the proportion of grafts lost during the first year after renal transplantation) have markedly decreased after the introduction of cyclosporin A. The reduction of the rate of graft loss after the first year, however, has been much less impressive. Chronic transplant nephropathy has become the most common cause of late graft failure [1]. Chronic allograft ne...
متن کاملReproducibility of the Banff schema in reporting protocol biopsies of stable renal allografts.
BACKGROUND There is evidence that biopsy of stable renal allografts may be of value in predicting chronic allograft nephropathy, the main cause of graft loss. However, the reproducibility of such histological evaluation has not been tested in this setting. We tested the reproducibility of the Banff schema for this purpose. METHODS We rated acute and chronic changes in 184 protocol biopsies. I...
متن کامل